Ryan Seacrest shirtless vs. Jimmy Kimmel shirtless – who looks better? Shockingly, Ryan Seacrest shirtless does not look better than Kimmel. In fact, some would say that Ryan Seacrest’s shirtless appearance is basically the same as Jimmy’s. What is wrong with Ryan Seacrest’s shirtless look? Where do I begin?

He needs to figure out how to reduce belly fat, pronto. Unless he is extremely bloated, he appears to carry a substantial amount of belly fat on his midsection, and he probably needs to lose 20 pounds. He also sports man boobs, just like Jimmy. His overall upper body development is basically nonexistent, which begs the question: Has Ryan Seacrest shirtless ever looked good without a shirt?

Appearances can be deceiving, of course. I think I remember the time when he seemed to be in a pretty good shape. I do not think I have ever seen him toned or anything like that, but at least his belly was not hanging below the waist. What is going here – has he been eating junk food for the past year? I hope not.

Anyway, it does not really matter what I think. I am much more interested in your opinion. So, Ryan Seacrest shirtless – hot or not? Does he need to get in shape soon or do you find him attractive no matter how, um, wide he looks? [source: Star]