Nicole Eggert Fat
Continued from Nicole Eggert’s Weight Gain.
Is Nicole Eggert fat? If Nicole Eggert is fat, just how fat is she? Technically, Nicole Eggert is fat. I mean, when you have rolls of bodyfat on your stomach, you can not be considered just slightly overweight.
Nicole Eggert’s belly fat is very visible, but the good news is that other parts of her body look decent. Her arms are not fat. And her hips and legs, while not lean, do not look bad either. But her belly fat is out of control, and that is a big problem, unless she can manage to lose 20 pounds in 20 days, which nobody can. However, her situation is not completely hopeless, far from it, to get things going into the right direction she just needs to know how to lose weight in 5 days.
It would have been better had she gained weight in other parts of her body. Why? Because it is very hard to lose belly fat without a strict diet. In addition, celebrities seem to be prone to falling for quick fixes that promise to reduce belly fat without losing overall weight, which never works, but a lot of celebrities still believe in the possibility of spot reduction. I hope she is not one of them.
What say you – is Nicole Eggert fat, in your opinion – or is she just overweight within an acceptable range? Does she even need to lose weight or do you think that she simply looks like a “real” woman?
Possibly related
RSS Feed
11-02-09 at 4:56 pm
I don’t think she’s fat but def a little chubby. I have a very hard time to keep my body in a good slim form and am not slim rather curvy but i do eat healthy which is even more frustrating. At least no typical fast food or candy.
12-23-09 at 5:11 pm
I am the same height and weight as Nicole and I feel very unfit. She used to be 110 now she is 130. I know how she feels. I’m an emotional eater. I know she will get her old body back. I’m cheering for her and can’t wait to see her succeed on celebrity fit club.
02-07-10 at 2:46 am
If she does weigh 130 (and she is supposed to be 5′1″), then her BMI is 24.6, which is considered healthy weight range, although on the upper end. If that is true, then she must have a very small bone structure (though I suspect her weight is about 10 to 15 pounds higher than that). She looks a bit above healthy weight to me, but certainly not fat and great for a mother and a woman her age.
03-01-10 at 12:36 am
Why are people so quick to dish out the fat comments these days? Hollywood is the worst. I do think she may be heavier then 130 pds but 130-150 pds for any woman is not fat to me. I still think she is an attractive woman. As a matter of fact, I believe woman with curves are more attractive then bean poles. Gaining weight, for most people, is a part of life. You can be skinny and unattractive. There are more desirable qualities to look for in a person then weight.