Matt Dillon Shirtless: Fat
Matt Dillon shirtless, not bad, I guess, for 44. He clearly has some muscle mass on his frame, but at the same time, I see love handles and a hanging belly. What is going on?
Matt Dillon shirtless but fat? So, is Matt Dillon fat? No, he is not. Well, his mid-section does show some belly fat. He needs to lose at least 10 pounds to look great shirtless. What is the point of having all those muscles if they are covered with a layer of fat? [source: Star]
Possibly related
RSS Feed