Keira Knightley: Anorexic or Skinny?
When most stars are airbrushed in photos, it’s to slim them down. But it’s the opposite for super-thin Keira Knightley.
Artists actually have to add curves to her figure. But the 22-year-old Knightley is tired of hearing about her weight. So, is Keira Knightley anorexic or naturally skinny?
At the Venice Film Festival on August 29, she said, “It’s really frustrating,” when reporters kept bringing up her thin figure.
But it was difficult to ignore the fact that the notoriously skinny 5′7″ Knightley seemed to have shrunken even more. “Keira looked shockingly gaunt,” says a witness.
“She is much too thin for her height and at least 20 pounds underweight,” adds Dr. Pescatore, who does not treat Keira. “It is potentially dangerous because most of these stars don’t realize that what they do to their bodies now affects their bodies for the rest of their lives.” [via]
Possibly related
RSS Feed
08-14-08 at 8:04 pm
Leave this kid alone… being thin doesn’t mean you’re anorexic. She’s naturally thin and that’s it. Period.
11-19-08 at 10:04 pm
I think so– she looks like I did when I was in my final stage of anorexia, just before my liver started to slowly fail. That, added to family history… totally anorexic. FOR SURE.
01-21-10 at 2:13 am
Leave Keira alone. She’s not anorexic – yeah, okay, she looks like it sometimes, but then I knew a seven-year old girl and her mother who both looked like that, although they ate A LOT. As much as they could, actually. It’s just her metabolism – like her own mother said, she’s like her dad. She has to eat like a horse just in order to NOT lose weight. Family history means nothing. I have a family history of both anorexia and bulemia, and yet I am at a healthy weight. On the verge of underweight, yeah, but NOT. I think the press should just stop harassing people.